User Prompt
“Write an RFI about the duct conflict with the beam at grid B-3 on level 2.”
Tool Call Sequence
Get the beam at grid B-3
Call: Response:What the agent learns so far: The duct bottom (10’-6”) is below the beam top (11’-2”) — they physically overlap by 8 inches. The agent has sheet references for both elements.
QueryCheck relevant general notes
Call: Response:What the agent learns: General Note 1 requires 2” clearance from structure. The duct-beam overlap violates this requirement.
QueryAgent Response
RFI #___ Subject: Duct/Beam Conflict at Grid B-3, Level 2 Reference Drawings:Description: The 24x12 supply air duct shown on M-201 at grid intersection B-3 conflicts with the W16x40 steel beam shown on S-201 at the same location. The duct bottom elevation (10’-6”) is 8” below the beam top elevation (11’-2”), creating a physical overlap. Per Mechanical General Note 1 on M-201, all ductwork shall maintain a minimum 2” clearance from structure. The current routing violates this requirement. Requested Action: Please advise on one of the following resolutions:
- M-201: Mechanical Level 2 Plan (24x12 SA duct, CL EL 11’-0”)
- S-201: Structural Level 2 Plan (W16x40 beam, T.O.S. 11’-2”, B.O.S. 9’-10”)
- Reroute the duct below the beam (requires minimum 9’-8” ceiling clearance confirmation)
- Provide a beam penetration detail if duct can pass through the web
- Resize the duct to fit above the beam flange
Summary
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Tool calls | 5 |
| Tools used | Query (feature, x2) > Query (block) > ViewImage (x2) |
| Key technique | The agent gathers all context in 3 data calls: conflicting features with elevations, applicable notes with clearance requirements, and reference images. The RFI text — conflict description, code citation, resolution options — is the agent’s domain reasoning, not MCP output. |